Title
“Price Wars and Premium Identity: A
Strategic Risk Management Analysis of Haldiram’s Sev Namkeen in India’s
Fragmented Snacks Market”

Abstract
India’s namkeen sector is
characterized by extreme fragmentation, intense price sensitivity, and a
dominant unorganized market. Haldiram—one of India’s most iconic FMCG snack
brands—faces escalating pressure from local manufacturers selling loose sev at
significantly lower prices, particularly in Tier-2 and Tier-3 regions. This
case-cum-research paper investigates how Haldiram balances affordability with
premium positioning through psychological pricing, selective discounting,
product diversification, and supply-side risk management. Using secondary data,
competitive mapping, and risk assessment frameworks, the study evaluates
threats such as health-driven preference shifts, inflation-led cost volatility,
and growing rivalry from both organized and unorganized players. Findings
reveal that Haldiram’s strategic mix of value-based pricing, limited
promotions, supply chain diversification, and heritage-driven brand
reinforcement sustains its competitive advantage without diluting brand equity.
Implications suggest that FMCG firms must adopt adaptive pricing, strengthen
product differentiation, and invest in health-oriented innovations to thrive in
price-intensive markets.
Keywords
Haldiram; Sev Namkeen; Pricing
Strategy; Brand Image; Risk Management; Price Wars; Consumer Behaviour; FMCG;
Competitive Strategy; India Snacks Market
1. Introduction
The Indian savory snacks market has
undergone dramatic expansion over the last decade, driven by urbanization,
rising disposable incomes, and changing eating habits. Yet, the sector remains highly
fragmented, with over 70% of market share held by local and
unorganized players selling low-priced loose products. Despite being a premium
and heritage brand, Haldiram competes directly with these local
sellers—especially in its flagship product category: sev namkeen.
Price wars have intensified as
unbranded manufacturers undercut branded players, threatening market share and
brand positioning. For Haldiram, the challenge lies in maintaining perceived
quality while offering price points acceptable in price-sensitive regions. This
paper examines how strategic risk management enables the firm to defend its
premium identity without sacrificing competitiveness.
2. Literature Review
2.1
Pricing Strategy in FMCG Markets
Research shows that FMCG consumers
often rely on psychological cues, reference prices, and perceived quality
(Kotler & Keller, 2021). Small pack pricing and ₹1–₹100 psychological
thresholds help brands penetrate rural and middle-income segments.
2.2
Brand Dilution and Price Cuts
Aggressive discounting can erode
brand equity (Aaker, 2015). FMCG brands must therefore balance short-term sales
targets with long-term identity protection.
2.3
Competitive Dynamics in Fragmented Markets
Unorganized competitors often
dominate through lower prices and deep local networks (NielsenIQ, 2023).
Branded players respond through packaging innovation, distribution expansion,
and supply chain optimization.
2.4
Consumer Preference Shift Toward Health
Growing awareness of calories, oil
content, and clean labels has shifted snack preferences, creating pressure on
traditional fried snacks (KPMG, 2024).
3. Theoretical Framework
This study draws on three strategic
frameworks:
3.1
Porter’s Five Forces
Used to analyze competitive rivalry,
substitution threats, and buyer power.
3.2
Risk Management Framework
Assesses operational, reputational,
competitive, and demand-side risks.
3.3
Value-Based Pricing Theory
Explains how perceived value—not
cost—drives willingness to pay.
4. Case Background: Haldiram’s Sev NamkeenMarket
Position
Haldiram competes in a category
where:
- Local sellers offer loose sev at significantly
lower prices.
- Branded players hold <30% of overall market
share.
- Price sensitivity peaks in Tier-2/3 towns.
Haldiram offers small packs of sev
priced between ₹29–₹55 (150g). This allows penetration without
compromising premium perception. However, risks include:
- Brand dilution from excess discounting
- Cost inflation on gram flour, edible oil, packaging
- Consumer shift toward baked/low-oil alternatives
- Supply chain disruptions
5. Methodology
This study uses:
5.1
Secondary Data Analysis
Industry reports, retail price
audits, and competitor pricing.
5.2
Qualitative Case Method
Interpretative analysis of
Haldiram’s strategic decisions.
5.3
Risk Matrix Mapping
Evaluating probability vs. impact of
key threats.
6. Analysis
6.1
Threat Assessment
a.
Intense Competition
- Local unorganized sellers offer extremely low prices.
- Organized rivals like Bikaji, Balaji, and Prabhuji
invest heavily in advertising.
b.
Health Trend Shift
Growing preference for baked,
multigrain, low-oil snacks impacts traditional sev demand.
c.
Cost Pressures
Volatile edible oil markets increase
production costs.
d.
Regulatory Risks
FSSAI norms and export compliance
add cost layers.
e.
Reputation Risks
Inconsistent raw material sourcing
may affect quality.
6.2
Haldiram’s Risk Mitigation Strategies
1.
Competitive & Psychological Pricing
- Affordable entry packs at ₹29, ₹49, and ₹55
- Maintaining price floors to protect premium image
- Avoiding permanent discounts; using festival-only
promotions
2.
Product Diversification
- Low-oil sev
- Baked namkeens
- Ready-to-eat (RTE) Indian snacks
- Multigrain mixtures
3.
Supply Chain Risk Management
- Local sourcing to reduce transport volatility
- Multi-supplier contracts for flour, spices, oil
- Automation in quality inspection
4.
Brand Protection Through Differentiation
- Highlighting heritage and authenticity in marketing
- Upgraded packaging for freshness & hygiene
- Emotional storytelling on authenticity
7. Findings
1.
Price Wars Do Not Always Require Price Cuts
Haldiram shows that value-based
small-pack pricing is more effective than aggressive discounting.
2.
Premium Brand Image Can Survive Competitive Pressure
By maintaining quality and
consistent taste, Haldiram preserves its premium perception even when offering
entry price points.
3.
Health-Oriented Innovation Is Critical
Diversified product lines help
counter market shifts toward healthier snacking.
4.
Supply Chain Strength Directly Impacts Pricing Power
Efficient sourcing and inventory
control support price stability.
8. Managerial Implications
For
Haldiram:
- Continue investing in medium- and low-price packs for
rural penetration.
- Expand healthier sev variants to capture
wellness-focused customers.
- Strengthen storytelling around quality and purity.
- Use targeted digital promotions instead of mass
discounting.
For
FMCG Firms:
- Price wars should be managed through value creation
rather than panic discounting.
- Small SKUs are powerful tools in price-sensitive
markets.
- Brand equity should be guarded through selective
promotional strategies.
9. Conclusion
Haldiram’s strategic response to
price wars in the sev namkeen segment illustrates how a heritage FMCG brand can
protect its premium identity without compromising market reach. Through
psychological pricing, diversification, controlled promotions, and strong
supply chains, it balances competitive pressures with long-term brand value. As
health trends reshape the snacks market, continued innovation in low-oil and
baked products will be essential for sustained relevance.
10. Future Scope for Research
- Impact of AI-driven demand forecasting on FMCG pricing.
- Comparative analysis between Haldiram and Bikaji’s
market strategies.
- Consumer perception studies on health-oriented
namkeens.
- Effectiveness of digital influencer marketing on
category penetration.
References
·
Aaker, D. A. (2015). Aaker on
branding: 20 principles that drive success. Morgan James Publishing.
·
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L.
(2021). Marketing management (16th ed.). Pearson.
·
KPMG. (2024). India’s snacking
market: Trends and consumer shifts. KPMG Insights Report.
·
NielsenIQ. (2023). India snacking
behaviour and brand preference study.
·
Singh, R., & Mahajan, P. (2022).
Pricing psychology and FMCG consumer behaviour in India. Journal of Retail
Insights, 14(2), 55–67.

No comments:
Post a Comment