Title: “From Plow to Precarity: Navigating India’s Agricultural Distress in 2025”
Introduction
India’s agricultural sector has long
been both its backbone and its Achilles’ heel. While agriculture supports the
livelihoods of a substantial portion of India’s population and contributes to
food security, persistent systemic challenges have strained the sector,
especially as pressures such as climate change, market volatility, and
structural inequities intensify. By 2025, many farmers continue to struggle
with low incomes, fragile access to technology and finance, and ever-worsening
weather extremes.
This article examines the current
state of agricultural distress in India, delves into empirical and statistical
evidence of the challenges, and then outlines a multi-pronged roadmap of
solutions—ranging from climate-resilient crops to infrastructure, policy
reforms, and institutional support. The goal is to argue that, with concerted
will and smart design, India can transform these precarious conditions into
pathways for sustainable agricultural growth.
Current
Landscape: How Serious Is the Distress?
Farming’s
Role and Its Contradictions
- Around 21.7 % of India’s working population is
still engaged in agriculture, despite declining shares over decades.
- At the same time, agriculture’s share of GDP has shrunk
to about 15 % in FY 2023, reflecting both structural transformation
and stagnating productivity.
- The contradiction is stark: more than one-fifth of
India’s workers are involved in a sector contributing a fraction of
national output, often under precarious conditions.
Indicators
of Distress
Farmer
Suicides and Debt
- The National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) reported 11,290
suicides among those identified as part of the farming sector in 2022
(5,207 farmers + 6,083 agricultural labourers)—about 6.6 % of total
suicides in India. Over the period 1995–2014, 296,438 farmers died by
suicide; in the nine years from 2014 to 2022, that figure was 100,474.
- Many analyses attribute a large share of suicides to
indebtedness, crop failure, and lack of alternative income sources.
- A 42 % spike in suicides was
observed from 2014 to 2015 alone, with debt and farm-related issues
identified in 60 % of cases.
- Credit Stress and NPAs
- Agricultural loans increasingly contribute to
non-performing assets (NPAs) in banks. In 2022, farm sector NPAs
constituted 17.4 % of the banking sector’s total NPAs, up from
15.07 % previously.
- This underscores the risk banks face from credit
extended to farmers, particularly small and marginal farmers who may not
have resilient incomes.
Yield
Stagnation & Production Gains
- India’s food grain production
did reach 332 million tonnes in 2023-24, a 27 % increase over nine
years. Yet despite this macro success, many farmers at the micro level
still face shrinking margins, rising input costs, and price volatility. In
addition, the adoption of climate-resilient agriculture practices remains
low. For example, among sample farmers, only 18 % used
climate-resilient variety selection (CRVS); other practices like direct
seeded rice (5.5 %), laser land leveling (5 %), or zero tillage (2.5 %)
had even lower adoption.
- The Climate Imperative
- It is estimated that yields of key crops like rice,
wheat, coarse grains, and oilseeds could decline by ~17 % by 2050
due to climate stress unless adaptation is prioritized.
- The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
notes that 151 districts (~20 % of India’s districts) are already
vulnerable to climate impact, and that climate change may reduce yields by
~9 % in the medium term.
- Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is gaining attention as
a framework to simultaneously raise productivity, reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, and strengthen resilience.
Dissecting
the Causes
Agricultural distress is not a
single-factor phenomenon. Instead, it is a complex convergence of structural,
environmental, institutional, and market-related issues.
1.
Small, Fragmented Land Holdings
- Most Indian farmers are small or marginal, with less
than 2 hectares of land. Fragmentation reduces economies of scale and
discourages investment in mechanization or modern methods. Fragmentation also
makes it more difficult to adopt newer technologies, irrigation, or
efficient cropping systems.
2.
Input Costs Rising, Output Prices Volatile
- Costs of fertilizer, seeds, electricity, fuel, and
labor have steadily risen, squeezing farmers' net margins. Market prices
for crops often fluctuate dramatically, sometimes leaving farmers with
losses. Researchers now model MSP (Minimum Support Price) as an implicit
put option to shield producers from volatility
- Supply chain inefficiencies and middlemen often capture
a disproportionate share of value.
3.
Limited Access to Credit, Insurance, and Risk Mitigation
- Small farmers often depend on informal credit sources
(moneylenders) at high interest rates. Crop insurance schemes are
under-utilized due to awareness gaps, high premiums, claim delays, and
structural flaws. Because farmers often operate with minimal surplus, any
adverse shock can push them into debt traps.
4.
Weak Irrigation & Infrastructure
- Only about 35 % of cultivated land is reliably
irrigated; the rest depends entirely on monsoon rains. Inadequate rural
roads, cold storages, and market linkages fail to support efficient
transport, preservation, and marketing of produce.
5.
Low Technological Penetration & Knowledge Gaps
- The rate of adoption of climate-smart practices remains
low—as noted, many promising practices are used by only a small minority.
Access to information, ICT services, and extension support is uneven. A
study in Haryana found that the ICT ecosystem (internet connectivity,
extension apps, information flow) is critical in improving farmers’
adaptation capacity.
- Many farmers cannot afford or operate advanced
machinery or high-quality inputs.
6.
Climate Extremes & Unpredictability
- Droughts, floods, unseasonal rains, and heat spells
have become more frequent and intense, undermining yields and increasing
losses.
- Small farmers lack buffer capacity to absorb these
shocks.
7.
Policy & Implementation Gaps
- While the government has introduced many welfare and
support schemes (subsidies, MSP, insurance, etc.), implementation is
patchy, corruption-prone, and often benefits larger or more connected
farmers.
- Many policies are rigid (e.g. procurement only for
certain crops or regions) and fail to adapt dynamically to local
conditions.
- Weak coordination between central, state, and local
governments adds complexity in execution.
Key Agricultural & Distress Indicators — Latest Available / Emerging
(2024 / 2025)
Indicator |
Latest Value /
Estimate |
Year / Range |
Notes &
Source |
Implication |
Agriculture & Allied GVA (Gross Value
Added, current prices) |
₹4,878,000 crore (₹ 4.878 lakh crore) |
2023–24 |
GVA of agriculture & allied has grown ~225 % from
₹1,502,000 crore in 2011–12 to 2023–24 Press Information
Bureau |
Shows strong nominal growth, though inflation confounds
real gains |
Gross Value of Output (GVO) — constant price
(2011–12 base) |
₹2,949,000 crore |
2023–24 |
Increased ~54.6 % since 2011–12 Press
Information Bureau |
Reflects real expansion, though less dramatic than nominal |
Share of crop sector in GVO (constant price) |
54.1 % |
2023–24 |
Crop sector remains dominant in agriculture/allied mix Press
Information Bureau |
Indicates cropping remains central to agricultural output |
Area sown — Kharif (All-India, progressive
report) |
~435.68 lakh hectares (Kharif as of late 2025) |
2025 (progressive) |
Based on “Progressive Crop Area Sown” report as of 26 Sept
2025 upag.gov.in |
Indicates scale of Kharif cropping; useful baseline |
Horticulture area & production |
(2nd advance estimates) for 2024–25 |
2024–25 |
As per horticulture estimates portal Agri
Welfare |
Reflects diversification / higher value cropping trends |
Fertilizer consumption (N + P + K nutrients) |
Various state-wise; e.g. Punjab: 247.6 kg/ha (total
nutrients) |
2023–24 (published in “Agriculture Database 2025”) Scribd |
Shows high input intensity in some states |
|
Farmer suicides in Maharashtra — Jan–Mar 2025 |
767 cases |
Jan–Mar 2025 |
Maharashtra state government reported 767 suicides in Q1
2025 Down To
Earth+1 |
Alarming rate — about 1 suicide every 3 hours in that period |
Total India farmer suicides (latest official
data) |
11,290 persons |
2022 |
From NCRB’s “Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India”
(2022) Wikipedia+1 |
Most recent full-year national number available |
Irrigated area / irrigation coverage |
~55.8 % of gross cropped area |
(Latest published) |
From a study “Farmers’ Suicide in India: Causes and Policy
Interventions” University
of Mumbai |
Many farmers still depend on rainfall for nearly half of
their land |
Record agricultural exports |
USD 51.9 billion |
2025 (export value) |
Reported in media “India agricultural exports 2025 surge…”
All About
Agriculture |
Strengthening global demand, but also expose farmers to
trade risks |
Projected record wheat & rice production |
Wheat ~117.5 million tonnes, Rice ~149 million tonnes |
2024–25 (ending June 2025) |
Reuters report projecting record harvests Reuters |
If realized, may ease food security and buffer stocks |
Progress in area under major summer / Kharif
crops |
Paddy: +12.4 %, area ~17.67 million ha; pulses up ~2.3 % |
2025 (mid-season data) |
From Reuters news on summer crop sowing trends Reuters |
Indicates shifting planting dynamics and responsive
cropping decisions |
Observations & Caveats
1.
Lag in official
distress data: While 2025 data for production, area, exports, etc. are
emerging, suicide / distress / debt / NPA
data are still officially reported only up to 2022 or possibly 2023. Global Agriculture+2Ministry of Stats & Program Implementation+2
2.
Projection vs
realized: Some figures (e.g. wheat/rice production for 2024–25) are projections, not yet confirmed harvest
outcomes. Reuters
3.
Regional
variation: The distress intensity (suicides, yield shortfalls) is not
uniform; states like Maharashtra (especially Vidarbha) continue to show severe
crisis indicators in recent months. Down To Earth+2Counterview+2
4.
Input
intensification: High fertilizer use in states like Punjab underscores
the input-intensive model, which may not be sustainable for marginal farmers. Scribd
5.
Irrigation gap
persists: Even with improvements, nearly 44 – 45 % of cropped area is
still dependent on rainfall or partial irrigation. University of Mumbai
1) National — 2025 →
2030 projection table (scenario ranges)
Base / anchor year used: 2023–24 or latest published
2024–25 estimates where explicitly noted. Key sources: MOSPI / PIB statistical
report (GVA & GVO), Govt. press notes on exports, and irrigation coverage
updates.
How to read this table: each indicator has a Base (2024/25) value (observed / official),
then three scenario projections for 2026, 2028, 2030:
·
Low:
conservative / adverse (slow growth, climate shocks, weaker policy delivery)
·
Baseline:
continuation of recent trends + moderate policy progress
·
Optimistic:
stronger policy action, improved irrigation & adoption of tech
Assumptions
(summarized)
• Production/GVO/GVA growth: baseline ≈ 1.5–2.5% p.a. real; optimistic ≈ 3–4%
p.a.; low ≈ 0–1% p.a.
• Irrigation expansion (net irrigated area share): baseline +0.5–1.0 pp/year;
optimistic +1.0–1.5 pp/year.
• Exports (value): baseline +3–5% p.a.; optimistic +6–8% p.a. (in USD terms,
assuming stable global demand).
• Farmer suicide incidence: baseline stable / small decline if safety nets
improve; low = increase under adverse shocks; optimistic = decline with robust
welfare and credit reforms.
• All monetary values in current nominal INR / USD unless noted.
Indicator |
Base (2024/25
or latest) |
2026 (Low /
Baseline / Opt.) |
2028 (Low /
Baseline / Opt.) |
2030 (Low /
Baseline / Opt.) |
Agriculture & Allied GVA (current prices) |
₹4,878,000 crore (2023–24 official). Press
Information Bureau |
₹4.88–₹5.0L cr · ₹5.0–₹5.3L cr · ₹5.2–₹5.6L cr |
₹4.9–₹5.2L cr · ₹5.1–₹5.8L cr · ₹5.6–₹6.2L cr |
₹4.9–₹5.4L cr · ₹5.3–₹6.3L cr · ₹6.0–₹7.0L cr |
Gross Value of Output (GVO) — constant prices
(2011–12 base) |
₹2,949,000 crore (2023–24). Press
Information Bureau |
-0.5%→+0.5% / +1.5% / +3% pa cumulative → roughly
₹2.94–₹2.98L cr · ₹2.99–₹3.05L cr · ₹3.03–₹3.20L cr |
₹2.93–₹3.05L cr · ₹3.04–₹3.16L cr · ₹3.12–₹3.45L cr |
₹2.9–₹3.1L cr · ₹3.10–₹3.3L cr · ₹3.2–₹3.8L cr |
Irrigated area (% of gross cropped area) |
~55% (FY21–FY24 upward trend; govt cites ~55% coverage). Press
Information Bureau+1 |
54–55% / 55.5–56.5% / 56.5–58% |
54–56% / 56–58.5% / 58–61% |
53.5–57% / 57–60% / 59–64% |
Agricultural exports (USD value) |
US$51.9 bn (2024–25 exports reported). Press
Information Bureau |
US$49–51bn / US$53–55bn / US$55–58bn |
US$47–52bn / US$55–60bn / US$60–68bn |
US$45–52bn / US$57–66bn / US$66–80bn |
Farmer suicides (annual national count) |
Last full official national dataset available to many
analysts: 2022–2023 figures (≈11k reported for 2022 — combined farmer + agri
labour counts; latest NCRB releases lag). Down To
Earth+1 |
+5–15% / -0–5% / -10–25% (relative to base) |
+10–30% / -5–15% / -20–40% |
+15–40% / -10–25% / -30–60% |
Input intensity — fertilizer use (kg/ha)
(sample high-use state) |
Example: Punjab >240 kg/ha (nutrients), 2023–24
datasets. Agri
Welfare |
Stable / small decline if subsidy rationalization &
balanced fert use / moderate decline with policy push |
Stable / small decline / moderate decline |
Stable / decline / moderate decline |
Post-harvest loss (%) — national average
(est.) |
~10–13% (widely cited range for perishables & cereals
combined) |
10–14% / 9–12% / 7–10% |
10–15% / 8–11% / 6–9% |
11–16% / 7–10% / 5–8% |
Notes on
projections:
• Monetary ranges reflect nominal values with conservative/optimistic growth
assumptions.
• Suicide projections are expressed as percent change because reliable official
annual numbers for 2024–25/2025 sometimes lag or are contested; Maharashtra Q1
2025 illustrates regional spikes. Down To Earth
• Exports are given in USD and depend on global commodity prices and trade
policy; 2024–25 actual = US$51.9 bn. Press Information Bureau
2) State-wise
comparative table (selected states) — latest observed (2024–early-2025
indicators)
States
selected: Maharashtra (high distress signals 2025), Punjab (high input
intensity & long-term distress), Uttar Pradesh (large cropped area &
procurement), Madhya Pradesh (user interest / central India), Karnataka (mixed
performance across horticulture & cereals). Key data points pulled from
state reports / national press & govt summaries.
State |
Recent suicide
indicator (notified / reported) |
Irrigation /
Water (approx %) |
Major cropping
pattern / notes |
Exports /
value-add notes / procurement presence |
Maharashtra |
767 farmer suicides reported
Jan–Mar 2025 (state govt figure); Vidarbha worst impacted — severe distress
hotspot. Down To
Earth+1 |
Irrigation coverage lower than national avg in many
districts; heartland rain-fed areas (Vidarbha). (State-level irrigation varies
widely) Directorate
of Economics and Statistics |
Cotton, soybean, pulses, sugarcane in parts — high
vulnerability to price & rainfall swings. |
Procurement for sugarcane large (state sugar mills);
limited central procurement for many crops; exports agri from state largely
in processed items (spotty). |
Punjab |
Long-term high farmer distress historically; NCRB shows
Punjab among higher numbers regionally (historical context). Wikipedia |
Very high input / irrigation intensity (example fertilizer
use ~247.6 kg/ha in some datasets). Agri
Welfare |
Rice–wheat dominated; high groundwater stress; overuse of
fertilizer; yields high but sustainability concerns. |
Major MSP procurement for wheat & paddy; major
contributor to foodgrain central buffer stocks. |
Uttar Pradesh (UP) |
Large absolute counts of agrarian distress historically
due to sheer population; NCRB and state reports show high numbers in past
years (absolute counts scale with population). Wikipedia |
Mixed — many zones irrigated but large rainfed tracts;
irrigation share rising with schemes. Directorate
of Economics and Statistics |
Paddy, wheat, sugarcane, potatoes, vegetables — very
diverse cropping. |
Large MSP procurement for wheat & rice; strong
domestic market linkages; growing horticulture in some districts. |
Madhya Pradesh (MP) |
Moderate-to-high distress pockets historically (central
India); state-level figures vary year to year. Directorate
of Economics and Statistics |
Variable — many semi-arid areas, but some irrigation and
micro-irrigation adoption programs exist. Directorate
of Economics and Statistics |
Soybean, pulses, wheat, maize — important central Indian
hub for oilseeds and pulses. |
Procurement relatively smaller than Punjab/UP but MP is
key in pulses/oilseed markets and processing. |
Karnataka |
Mixed: certain districts show farmer suicides
historically; state-level numbers fluctuate. Wikipedia |
South Indian states often have higher horticulture &
irrigated pockets; Karnataka irrigation share variable by district. Directorate
of Economics and Statistics |
Strong horticulture (fruits, vegetables), coffee,
sugarcane in some zones; diversification higher than some northern states. |
Horticultural exports and value-add (processed mango,
banana, spices) significant; state has strong value-chain clusters. |
Caveats
& reading guidance (state table):
• State suicide numbers can be reported differently (eligible cases for
compensation vs. raw counts); Maharashtra’s Q1 2025 number (767) is a sharp,
recent example of an acute spike and should be interpreted alongside historical
trends.
• Irrigation percentages vary by data source and year — national aggregates
place irrigated share near ~55% (FY21–FY24 upward movement). Use district-level
data for precise local planning.
Statistical
Snapshot & Comparative Table
Below is a synthesized table
summarizing key metrics, trends, and comparisons that highlight the severity of
distress and areas needing intervention.
Indicator |
Value
/ Trend |
Implication |
Share of workforce in agriculture |
~21.7 % |
Large reliance on agriculture
despite declining profitability |
Agriculture’s share in GDP |
~15 % (2023) |
Structural shift out of farming,
low productivity per worker |
Farmer suicides (2022) |
11,290 (farmers + agri labourers) |
Signifier of deep distress |
Cumulative suicides (1995–2014) |
296,438 |
Long-term crisis, not just recent
phenomenon |
Adoption rate of CRVS
(climate-resilient variety) |
~18 % (in sample) |
Most farmers are not using
climate-adaptive seeds |
Farm sector NPAs (2022) |
17.4 % of total NPAs |
Significant burden on banking and
credit markets |
Projected yield loss from climate
change |
Up to 17 % decline in key crops by
2050 |
Climate is a looming structural
threat |
Proportion of districts vulnerable
to climate |
~20 % (151 districts) |
Many areas already under stress |
This table underscores the scale and
interlocking nature of distress: social (suicides, debt), institutional
(credit, insurance), environmental (climate), and technological (low adoption).
A
Roadmap for Revival: Strategies & Solutions
To turn the tide and build a more
resilient, equitable agricultural future, a combination of interventions is
needed. Below, I outline a multi-layered approach.
1.
Innovation & Research for Climate-Resilient Crops
- Ramp up public and private investment in R&D to
develop crop varieties tolerant to drought, heat, salinity, pests, and
erratic rainfall.
- Strengthen molecular breeding, marker-assisted
selection, genomic tools, and CRISPR-based approaches to accelerate
development of resilient genetics.
- Focus on locally adapted varieties and participatory
breeding, involving farmers in selection.
- Ensure seed dissemination systems are robust and
accessible, especially to smallholders.
- Promote intercropping, crop rotations, and
diversification to build ecological resilience.
2.
Scaling Climate-Smart Agriculture Practices
- Promote adoption of climate-smart practices
(zero/minimum tillage, drip irrigation, soil moisture conservation, crop
diversification).
- Use subsidy incentives, demonstration plots, and extension
support to encourage adoption.
- Leverage ICT, mobile apps, and local agro-ecological
advisories to guide farmers in practice selection.
- Develop “climate-smart hubs” at district or block level
to aggregate resources, tools, and training.
3.
Irrigation, Water Management & Infrastructure
- Accelerate expansion and maintenance of irrigation
networks (canals, borewells, micro-irrigation).
- Invest in rainwater harvesting, groundwater recharge
structures, check dams, and watershed development.
- Promote precision irrigation technologies (e.g. drip,
sprinkler) especially in water-scarce zones.
- Upgrade rural roads, cold storage, packhouses, and
market infrastructure to reduce post-harvest loss.
4.
Financial Inclusion, Risk Mitigation & Support Systems
- Reform crop insurance schemes to ensure affordability,
transparency, timely claim settlement, and coverage of “non-yield” risks.
- Introduce weather-indexed insurance models and tie them
to smaller units (village, block) to reduce moral hazard.
- Offer subsidized credit with safety nets and grace
periods during adverse years.
- Consider novel financial instruments (e.g. MSP treated
as a put option, as some researchers suggest) to hedge price risk.
- Strengthen microfinance, self-help groups, farmer
producer organizations (FPOs), and cooperative credit systems.
5.
Fair Procurement, Market Access & Value Chains
- Expand procurement under MSP across more crops,
locations, and crops beyond cereals.
- Reform minimum support and assure procurement even in
remote or rain-fed areas.
- Strengthen market linkages: e-marketplaces,
aggregation, logistics, contract farming with safeguards.
- Promote value addition (processing, packaging) in rural
zones to retain a higher share of final value.
- Encourage FPOs/aggregators to reduce middlemen
exploitation and improve bargaining power.
6.
Institutional Reforms & Governance
- Strengthen coordination between central, state, and
panchayat-level institutions for agriculture, water, credit, and rural
development.
- Build capacity in extension services; recruit and train
more ground-level agricultural officers.
- Introduce performance incentives, monitoring, and
accountability for scheme delivery.
- Decentralize planning: allow flexibility in scheme
design based on local agro-ecological and social conditions.
- Encourage public–private partnerships in agritech
adoption, infrastructure, and service delivery.
7.
Social Safety Nets & Alternative Livelihoods
- Provide conditional income supports, like crop disaster
relief, for severely hit farmers.
- Promote agricultural diversification into allied
sectors (horticulture, livestock, beekeeping, aquaculture, agroforestry).
- Encourage off-farm employment opportunities, rural
non-farm industries, and skill training programs.
- Strengthen rural social protection (health, education,
insurance) to reduce vulnerability.
8.
Empowering Through Information & ICT
- Expand rural internet connectivity and broadband
access.
- Develop farmer-friendly platforms that deliver
real-time weather, advisory, pricing, pest alerts, and extension content.
- Integrate local language support and audio-visual tools
for low-literacy farmers.
- Promote participatory digital platforms (e.g., farmer
feedback systems) to improve trust and adoption.
- Strengthen extension–ICT nexus: extension officers act
as facilitators for digital adoption.
Scenario
Modeling & Monitoring
- Use climate-price linkage models (e.g. as proposed in
Black-Scholes + EGARCH frameworks) to estimate volatility and design
targeted interventions in price risk insurance.
- Deploy crop recommendation systems using machine
learning that integrates environmental, economic, and yield data to guide
farmers on optimal crops or crop rotations. A recent study showed Random
Forest models reaching ~83.6 % accuracy under lag variable approach.
- Monitor adoption and impact via rigorous field trials,
randomized controlled trials, and remote sensing data to guide policy
course corrections.
Challenges
& Risks
- Political economy: subsidy and procurement reforms may
face resistance from vested interests.
- Financing: scaling all these interventions demands huge
and sustained public and private investment.
- Adoption gap: small and marginal farmers may resist
switching practices due to risk aversion and lack of capital.
- Institutional bottlenecks: corruption, delayed
implementation, coordination failures.
- Climate uncertainty: even adaptive measures may not
fully offset extreme weather.
- Equity: ensuring benefits reach marginalized, tenant,
tribal, and women farmers.
Conclusion
The distress afflicting India’s
farmers in 2025 is neither new nor trivial. Yet, it is not inevitable. The
statistics—of suicides, debt, low adoption, and climate loss—are urgent calls
for systemic change. The country’s agricultural sector, properly rejuvenated,
can become a driver of inclusive growth, climate resilience, and food security.
Key to progress is a dual focus:
- Innovation + Infrastructure — delivering climate-resilient crops, modern
practices, irrigation, and connectivity; and
- Institutional & Policy Reform — restructuring credit, insurance, procurement, market
access, extension, and governance.
Success will depend heavily on
coordinated action across central, state, and local governments, partnering
with private actors, civil society, research institutions, and farmers
themselves. With political will and adaptive learning, India can transform the
conditions of distress into a new era of sustainable agrarian prosperity.
References
- “Unravelling
agrarian distress in India: A comprehensive analysis of causes and
manifestations,” International Journal of Agriculture Extension and
Social Development (2024) “
- India’s
Experience with Climate Smart Agriculture,” Asia Foundation / ICAR (2024)
“How can India Scale Climate-Resilient Agriculture Practices and Smart
Farming,” CEEW (2025) “Sustainable Finance Flows to India’s Agriculture
Sector,” Climate Policy Initiative (2025) “Promotion of Climate Resilient
Farming,” PRS India report Jat et al. (2025), “Bridging the gap:
challenges and adoption of climate-resilient practices”
- “Crop
recommendation with machine learning … in Indian context,” arXiv (2025)
o Predicting and Mitigating Agricultural Price Volatility
Using Climate Scenarios and Risk Models,” arXiv (2025)
·
MOSPI / PIB — Statistical
Report on Value of Output from Agriculture and Allied Sectors (GVA, GVO
figures, 2023–24). Press Information Bureau
·
Press note / Ministry of Agriculture — Agri
& allied exports value 2024–25 = US$51.9
bn (PIB release July 29, 2025). Press Information Bureau
·
DowntoEarth / state reporting on Maharashtra — 767 farmer suicides reported Jan–Mar
2025 (state figure; Q1 crisis). Down To Earth+1
·
PIB / Economic Survey / other government briefs
on irrigation: coverage rose toward ~55%
of gross cropped area (FY16→FY21 trend, reiterated in 2024–25 briefs). Press Information Bureau+1
·
Agricultural Statistics / DES / “Agricultural
Statistics at a Glance” — gross cropped area and crop area baselines used for
state comparisons. Directorate of Economics and
Statistics
Comments
Post a Comment