
Chapter 7: Technology Services – Global Contracts in a Local Age
Introduction
Technology services, once considered borderless, have found themselves at
the frontline of reverse globalization. Outsourcing models that thrived on
cross-border talent, cost arbitrage, and global delivery systems now face
barriers due to visa restrictions, local hiring mandates, and protectionist
policies. The Trump-era H-1B tightening in the United States, followed
by similar sentiments in Europe and parts of Asia, revealed the vulnerability
of IT services firms dependent on global contracts but reliant on imported
human capital.
The U.S. alone accounts for nearly 60% of revenue for Indian IT
giants like Infosys, TCS, and Wipro, yet visa rejection rates for
Indian applicants soared from 6% in 2015 to nearly 30% in 2018
under stricter scrutiny. These changes forced companies to reconsider delivery
models—more local hires, onshore development centers, and digital-first
strategies rather than traditional labor-intensive outsourcing.
Reverse globalization did not eliminate opportunities but reshaped them.
Companies were compelled to act global but hire local,
creating hybrid models of contract execution where cloud, automation, and local
employees filled the gaps once dominated by cross-border staffing.
Story: IT Brands Under Pressure
In 2017, Infosys executives gathered in Bengaluru for an emergency
strategy meeting. U.S. clients, including banks and retailers, had raised
concerns: visa processing delays meant projects could not start on time. An
internal report revealed that nearly 40% of planned staff deployments
were stuck in visa queues.
“If we cannot send engineers, clients may move to U.S.-based competitors,”
warned a senior manager.
The leadership decided to announce 10,000 local hires in the U.S.,
coupled with six technology hubs across Indiana, Texas, and
North Carolina. This move reassured clients but increased operational costs by 15–20%,
since American salaries were significantly higher than Indian wages.
TCS faced similar challenges. When a New Jersey client
threatened to cancel a multi-million-dollar contract due to visa denials, TCS
accelerated its nearshore delivery centers in Canada and Mexico.
Staff from Mexico worked in real-time with U.S. teams, ensuring compliance with
local laws while maintaining cost competitiveness.
Wipro, meanwhile, invested in automation tools. Instead of
sending hundreds of engineers onsite, Wipro developed AI-driven testing
platforms that allowed remote execution with fewer onsite staff.
Each company faced the same dilemma: protectionist outsourcing reduced
mobility, but digital technologies and local strategies offered survival
routes.
Reverse Globalization & Trump Policy Impact
Trump’s “America First” policy particularly targeted the H-1B visa
program, central to India’s $150 billion IT outsourcing industry. The
message was clear: companies benefitting from U.S. markets should also invest
in American workers.
Key impacts included:
·
Higher Visa Rejections: Many
mid-level IT workers were denied entry, forcing companies to deploy senior
staff or locals at higher cost.
·
Local Hiring Pressure: Firms
pledged thousands of U.S. jobs, often at three times the cost of Indian hires.
·
Shift to Nearshoring: Centers
in Canada, Eastern Europe, and Latin America gained importance.
·
Automation Acceleration: Firms
reduced dependence on manpower through AI, machine learning, and robotic
process automation (RPA).
·
Contract Restructuring: Clients
demanded compliance with local labor policies in contracts, embedding
protectionism into business models.
Data Snapshot
Table 7.1: Impact of Reverse Globalization on IT/Tech Services (2016–2020)
Factor |
Pre-Trump Era
(2014–2016) |
Trump Era
(2017–2020) |
Impact on IT
Firms |
Response
Strategy |
H-1B Visa Approval Rates |
85–90% |
65–70% |
Project delays, staff shortages |
Local hiring & nearshore centers |
Avg. Visa Processing Time |
2–3 months |
6–9 months |
Uncertainty in project deployment |
Parallel digital solutions |
Local Hiring in U.S. |
10–15% of workforce |
25–30% of workforce |
Increased wage costs |
Talent development hubs |
Onsite vs Offshore Cost Ratio |
1:3 |
1:5 |
Pressure on margins |
Automation & AI adoption |
Client Contract Clauses |
Minimal local compliance |
Strict local labor compliance |
Risk of penalties |
Restructured contracts |
Revenue Growth of Indian IT Majors |
8–10% annually |
5–6% annually |
Slowed expansion |
Diversification to Europe/Asia |
Analysis
Reverse globalization in technology services represents a paradox.
While protectionist policies sought to limit outsourcing, the globalized nature
of digital work meant firms had to evolve rather than withdraw.
·
Clients demanded assurance that
services would not be disrupted by political changes.
·
Companies diversified geographically,
investing in Canada, Poland, Mexico, and Singapore.
·
Digital-first contracts emerged,
where cloud-based solutions reduced dependency on physical relocation.
·
Margins thinned, but
reputational credibility increased as companies adapted.
In many ways, Trump’s policy acted as a catalyst for modernization.
The old model of sending armies of coders overseas was replaced by hybrid
frameworks that blend local talent, nearshore hubs, and automation.
Technology services under reverse globalization highlight how global
contracts are no longer about low-cost coding alone but about trust,
compliance, and adaptability. Visa restrictions and protectionist
policies reshaped the IT outsourcing landscape, but companies like Infosys,
TCS, and Wipro turned adversity into opportunity by rethinking delivery models.
As one senior executive put it:
“The age of cheap outsourcing is ending. The age of smart, local-global
partnerships has begun.”
In this local age of global contracts, technology firms are
not abandoning globalization—they are rewriting its rules.
Mini
Case-Cum Stories: Indian IT Brands in Reverse Globalization
1.
Infosys – Local Hubs, Global Scrutiny
Infosys pledged 10,000 U.S. hires
during Trump’s presidency to overcome visa denials. While this reassured
clients, today’s challenge comes from AI-driven automation reducing
demand for entry-level coders. Infosys is investing heavily in Generative AI
partnerships with NVIDIA and retraining engineers in data science. The dual
threat: rising costs from local hiring and shrinking demand for
repetitive coding tasks.
2.
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) – The Nearshore Play
When H-1B denials peaked, TCS
expanded its Canada and Mexico delivery centers. This strategy remains
relevant as U.S.–China tensions create supply chain realignments.
Clients increasingly want “friend-shoring” contracts, and TCS is
pitching itself as a neutral, reliable provider. But margins are thinning as Canadian
salaries exceed Indian averages threefold.
3.
Wipro – Automation as Armor
Visa denials forced Wipro to push AI-driven
testing platforms that cut dependency on onsite engineers. Today, Wipro
faces cybersecurity threats as global ransomware attacks rise. Its
acquisition of U.S.-based cybersecurity firms is both a defensive and growth
play. Reverse globalization triggered automation; world threats pushed it
into security-first contracts.
4.
HCLTech – Betting on Europe
HCL shifted focus to Germany,
France, and the Nordics when U.S. restrictions tightened. But EU’s GDPR
and AI Act have made compliance costly. HCL must now juggle local data
storage mandates with cloud partnerships. Reverse globalization made HCL
less U.S.-centric, but world regulations created fragmented digital markets.
5.
Tech Mahindra – Telecom Pressure
Trump’s policies delayed Tech
Mahindra’s telecom staffing in the U.S., but today’s challenge is 5G
geopolitics. With Huawei banned in several countries, Tech Mahindra is
positioning itself as a trusted integrator. Yet, semiconductor shortages
and client cost cuts in Europe post-Ukraine war hit revenues.
6.
Mindtree (now LTIMindtree) – Digital-first Clients
Mindtree turned U.S. protectionism
into an opportunity by focusing on remote-first digital contracts for
retail and airlines. But current threats lie in generative AI replacing
marketing analytics roles, squeezing its niche services. It must reinvent
as a cloud + AI transformation partner.
7.
Cognizant India – Identity Crisis
Though U.S.-headquartered, Cognizant
employs over 200,000 in India. Trump’s push forced it to accelerate local
U.S. hiring, which reduced Indian dependency. Now, global clients demand AI
plus cybersecurity integration, forcing Cognizant India into costlier skill
upgrades.
8.
L&T Infotech – Contract Risk Mitigation
L&T Infotech faced penalties
when projects stalled due to visa issues. They responded by inserting “force
majeure due to policy” clauses in contracts. Today, the challenge is currency
volatility and high U.S. inflation, which pressure contract
profitability.
9.
Mphasis – Banking Woes
Mphasis’ U.S. banking clients demanded
onsite presence during Trump-era scrutiny. Now, with U.S. regional bank
collapses (2023–24), demand has fallen. Reverse globalization squeezed them
earlier, but now systemic financial threats are equally damaging.
10.
Persistent Systems – Cloud Adaptation
Persistent turned visa curbs into an
opportunity for offshore cloud services. But today, data sovereignty
laws in Europe and Asia mean contracts must keep data “within borders,”
fragmenting delivery models. Persistent’s challenge: customizing cloud
solutions country by country.
11.
Hexaware – Cost Wars
Hexaware built low-cost nearshore
centers in Mexico to bypass U.S. restrictions. But global inflation since
2022 has eroded the cost advantage. Clients now demand AI-powered
cost reductions, forcing Hexaware into heavy R&D spending.
12.
NIIT Technologies – Talent Crunch
Trump-era limits reduced staff
mobility, pushing NIIT to train locals. Now, talent shortages in AI,
cybersecurity, and cloud remain the biggest hurdle. Unlike larger peers,
NIIT struggles to fund massive reskilling programs.
13.
Zensar Technologies – Niche Focus
Zensar pivoted from traditional IT
outsourcing to digital commerce after visa issues. Today, global
e-commerce slowdown and retail bankruptcies in the West cut into
revenues. Reverse globalization forced reinvention, but macro shocks
threaten sustainability.
14.
Birlasoft – Contract Diversification
Birlasoft diversified into Japan
and Middle East contracts after U.S. resistance. Current threats include currency
fluctuations and oil-linked economic slowdowns impacting Middle East
clients. Protectionism forced diversification; global economics now test
resilience.
15.
Sonata Software – Tourism Exposure
Sonata suffered when Trump
restrictions stalled its travel-tech staffing. Now, global airline
strikes and recession fears hurt its tourism clients. Sonata is shifting
toward cloud platforms for e-commerce, away from travel dependency.
16.
Ramco Systems – ERP in Turbulence
Ramco’s aviation ERP projects in the
U.S. were delayed by visa rejections. Today, supply chain disruptions in
aviation parts and geopolitical conflicts (Ukraine, Taiwan risks)
hit its aviation-focused client base.
17.
KPIT Technologies – Auto Tech Risks
KPIT depends on automotive
contracts in the U.S. and Europe. Trump-era outsourcing pushback forced more
Germany-based hiring. Today, EV slowdown, chip shortages, and regulatory
uncertainty hurt margins.
18.
Cyient – Engineering Challenges
Cyient faced hurdles deploying
engineers onsite in the U.S. under Trump. Now, cyber-physical security risks
in defense and aerospace industries challenge contracts. Reverse globalization
forced local centers in the U.S., which remain vital due to geopolitical
defense contracts.
19.
Sasken Technologies – Shrinking Niches
Sasken struggled during Trump-era
because of its niche focus on semiconductor software. Now, global
chip wars and U.S.–China restrictions both create opportunity and
volatility. Sasken must balance supply chain risks with demand from
“friend-shoring” partners.
20.
Happiest Minds – Cloud Security Pivot
This Bengaluru firm thrived by
skipping labor-intensive outsourcing and focusing on cloud & security.
Visa limits had little impact, but current global cyberattacks have
created both opportunity and heavy liability—contracts now demand cyber
insurance backing.
21.
Newgen Software – Workflow Automation
Trump-era changes nudged Newgen
toward automation-heavy solutions requiring fewer staff relocations.
Today, AI competitors like UiPath threaten its RPA business. Newgen
invests in AI-integrated workflow platforms to stay competitive.
22.
Sify Technologies – Data Center Pressures
Visa curbs had little effect since
Sify focuses on data centers in India. But now, climate change-linked
energy restrictions and rising electricity costs in India challenge
profitability. World threats > Trump policies in this case.
23.
Polaris Consulting (now Intellect Design Arena) – Banking Constraints
During Trump-era, clients demanded onsite
delivery for core banking IT. Today, fintech disruptions and digital
currency regulations threaten traditional banking IT. Intellect must
reinvent as a fintech integrator rather than legacy service provider.
24.
Quess Corp – Staffing Model Risks
Quess provides IT staffing services.
Trump’s restrictions cut demand for offshore engineers in the U.S. Today, gig
economy models, AI freelancing platforms, and labor law tightening in
Europe threaten its manpower-heavy business model.
25.
Indian Startups (Freshworks, Zoho, BrowserStack) – The Local Advantage
Unlike IT giants, SaaS startups like
Freshworks, Zoho, and BrowserStack thrived despite Trump’s policies
since they operated cloud-first, subscription-based models. But today, AI-native
global competitors (OpenAI plugins, Microsoft Copilot integrations)
threaten their SaaS niches. They face a fight for survival in AI-first
enterprise software.
Thematic
Analysis
Across these 25 cases, a pattern
emerges:
- Trump-era threats:
visa denials, onsite client pressure, higher U.S. local hiring costs.
- World threats today:
AI replacing labor, cyberattacks, inflation, regulatory fragmentation,
geopolitical shocks.
- Common adaptations:
local hiring hubs, automation, diversification into Europe/Asia, AI
retraining, and contract redesign.
Indian IT has evolved from labor
arbitrage to digital-first partnerships, but margins are thinner, risks
more complex, and competition increasingly AI-driven.
The journey of Indian IT under
reverse globalization reveals resilience but also fragility. Trump’s policies
exposed the overdependence on visas, while current world threats—AI disruption,
cyber risks, inflation, and geopolitics—are forcing the next big reinvention.
As one CIO client remarked:
“We no longer ask who can code
cheapest. We ask who can deliver secure, local, AI-enabled contracts that
survive political storms.”
For Indian IT brands, the future
lies in hybrid global-local strategies, deep AI integration, and resilient
business models that can withstand both policy reversals and world
uncertainties.
Table 7.2: Impact of Reverse Globalization & World Threats on IT/Tech
Services (2016–2025)
Factor |
Pre-Trump Era
(2014–2016) |
Trump Era
(2017–2020) |
Post-Pandemic
& Current (2021–2025) |
Impact on IT
Firms |
Response
Strategy |
H-1B Visa Approval Rates |
85–90% |
Dropped to 65–70%; denial rates up 4x by 2018 |
Stabilized ~75–80% by 2023–24, but registrations fell 27%
in 2025 due to fee hikes/policy shifts |
Ongoing staff shortages; uncertainty in mobility |
Expanded U.S. local hiring; nearshore centers in Canada,
Mexico |
Visa Processing Time |
2–3 months |
6–9 months |
5–6 months average; delays continue due to backlogs |
Project deployment uncertainty remains |
Hybrid delivery (offshore + digital platforms) |
Local Hiring in U.S. |
10–15% of workforce |
25–30% by 2020 |
30–35% by 2025 (Infosys, TCS, Wipro report 10k–13k+ hires
in U.S.) |
Higher wage costs pressure margins |
Invest in U.S. hubs, training locals |
Onsite vs Offshore Cost Ratio |
1:3 |
1:5 (onsite more expensive) |
1:6+ by 2025 due to inflation & salary rises |
Offshore still cheaper but clients demand local compliance |
Automation, AI-first delivery |
Client Contract Clauses |
Minimal local rules |
Local labor compliance clauses added |
Data sovereignty, AI regulation (EU AI Act, 2024) & cyber
liability terms added |
High compliance cost |
Embedding legal/compliance teams |
Cybersecurity Risks |
Low priority |
Growing but secondary |
Top client concern by 2023–25 (ransomware record highs) |
High reputational risk, potential penalties |
Cybersecurity acquisitions, insurance-backed contracts |
Revenue Growth of Indian IT Majors |
8–10% annually |
Slowed to 5–6% |
Stabilized at 4–7% (TCS FY25 revenue ~$30.2B) |
Growth steady but margins thin |
Diversify into AI, cloud, SaaS |
AI & Automation Adoption |
Early pilots |
Accelerated to replace onsite manpower |
AI-first strategies dominate 2024–25; GenAI reducing
demand for entry-level coders |
Workforce disruption |
Large-scale reskilling programs |
Geopolitical Exposure |
Limited |
Trade wars begin (U.S.–China) |
2022–25: Ukraine war, Taiwan tensions, data localization
laws |
Client risk & delivery fragmentation |
Multi-region delivery, “friend-shoring” |
Short interpretive notes
1.
Visa
shocks became structural: The large jump in H-1B denial rates in the
Trump years (FY2015→FY2018) and subsequent policy/fee changes through 2024–25
pushed Indian IT firms to institutionalize U.S. hiring programs and nearshore
centres rather than treat them as ad-hoc fixes. Regulatory fragmentation increased
cost of delivery: The EU AI Act (final text published 2024;
obligations phasing in through 2025–26) plus persistent data-sovereignty rules
force Indian vendors to re-architect offerings for regional compliance — often
adding local data storage, audits, and compliance teams. This reduces the “one
global build” efficiency. Cybersecurity
has moved from niche to central: Ransomware and AI-enabled cyber
threats rose sharply in 2023–24 and continued into 2025, increasing client
demand for security-first contracts and pushing margins toward high-value,
high-trust services (cyber, incident response, insurance-backed SLAs)
2. Sector resilience but margin pressure:
Big Indian IT firms still grow (TCS reached ~$30.2B revenue for FY25), but
growth rates moderate and delivery costs (onshore hiring, compliance, security)
put pressure on traditional margin structures — the industry’s strategic play
is moving into higher-value product/AI/cloud services.
“Data through 2025 confirm that the
visa shock and policy churn became structural rather than temporary. H-1B
denials rose sharply in the mid-2010s, prompting Infosys and others to
institutionalize large U.S. hiring drives (Infosys’ 2017 pledge — later expanded
to 13,000+ hires). At the same time, new regulations such as the EU AI Act
(published 2024) and a wave of increasingly sophisticated ransomware attacks
(2023–24) have shifted client priorities toward local presence, compliance and
security—forcing Indian firms to trade some margin for resilience and trust.
TCS’ FY25 results (~$30.2B revenue) show the sector’s scale, but also the
limits of old arbitrage models.”
Suggestions & How Brands Overcome Challenges
1. Infosys
Suggestion:
Accelerate GenAI-led services and retrain junior coders.
Overcoming: Infosys partners with
NVIDIA and Microsoft, investing in AI
skilling programs and local U.S. hubs to offset visa and automation
risks.
2. TCS
Suggestion:
Deepen “friend-shoring” in Canada, Mexico, and Eastern Europe.
Overcoming: TCS builds North American delivery clusters,
sustaining growth while balancing higher costs with automation in finance and
retail sectors.
3. Wipro
Suggestion:
Strengthen its cybersecurity practice into a revenue engine.
Overcoming: Wipro’s U.S. acquisitions in cloud security and AI-powered testing platforms cut
dependency on visas and add resilience against ransomware risks.
4. HCLTech
Suggestion:
Focus on compliance-first solutions for EU clients.
Overcoming: HCL invests in GDPR and AI Act readiness teams,
offering “compliance + cloud” packages to European clients while expanding AI
labs in India.
5. Tech Mahindra
Suggestion:
Pivot telecom services toward 5G + enterprise AI integration.
Overcoming: TechM strengthens alliances with Ericsson & Nokia and
expands into private 5G and digital twin
contracts, cushioning chip shortages.
6. LTIMindtree
Suggestion:
Differentiate with vertical-specific AI solutions.
Overcoming: LTIMindtree scales digital-first models for airlines and
retail, reducing exposure to visa restrictions by building “remote delivery
playbooks.”
7. Cognizant India
Suggestion:
Elevate from staff-augmentation to IP-driven solutions.
Overcoming: Cognizant invests in
AI-enabled platforms while
keeping a dual workforce model—local
hires in U.S. + offshore specialists.
8. L&T Infotech
Suggestion:
Protect margins via contract redesign and inflation clauses.
Overcoming: LTI adds currency hedging and risk-sharing terms,
ensuring predictable revenue despite high inflation in the West.
9. Mphasis
Suggestion:
Diversify away from U.S. regional banks into fintech and insurance.
Overcoming: Mphasis expands digital banking SaaS offerings and
builds cloud-based solutions for insurers,
reducing dependency on vulnerable banking clients.
10. Persistent Systems
Suggestion:
Build sovereign cloud-ready solutions.
Overcoming: Persistent
customizes cloud for country-specific
regulations, making it a trusted partner for EU and APAC clients with local compliance guarantees.
11. Hexaware
Suggestion:
Move from low-cost model to automation-first delivery.
Overcoming: Hexaware develops AI-driven cost optimization tools,
turning rising wages into opportunities by reducing human-intensive delivery.
12. NIIT Technologies
Suggestion:
Build internal AI academies to counter talent gaps.
Overcoming: NIIT launches in-house training platforms to reskill
engineers in GenAI, analytics, and cybersecurity, instead of relying on
external hiring.
13. Zensar Technologies
Suggestion:
Diversify beyond retail e-commerce.
Overcoming: Zensar expands into healthcare and manufacturing analytics,
reducing exposure to fragile retail clients.
14. Birlasoft
Suggestion:
Cushion forex risks with hedging and sectoral diversification.
Overcoming: Birlasoft enters automotive software and logistics IT,
while maintaining Middle East presence cautiously.
15. Sonata Software
Suggestion:
Build resilience outside tourism verticals.
Overcoming: Sonata shifts to cloud commerce and AI-enabled ERP,
protecting revenue from airline/tourism volatility.
16. Ramco Systems
Suggestion:
Invest in aviation predictive analytics.
Overcoming: Ramco launches AI-driven ERP for aviation parts tracking,
turning supply chain disruptions into an opportunity for smarter tools.
17. KPIT Technologies
Suggestion:
Double down on EV software and chip collaborations.
Overcoming: KPIT partners with global EV makers and invests in semiconductor R&D, insulating
against auto slowdowns.
18. Cyient
Suggestion:
Embed cyber-physical security into aerospace contracts.
Overcoming: Cyient develops defense-grade cybersecurity integrated
with engineering services, appealing to Western defense clients amid
geopolitics.
19. Sasken Technologies
Suggestion:
Leverage chip wars as opportunity for niche growth.
Overcoming: Sasken partners with
Indian semiconductor initiatives
and U.S. “friend-shoring” clients,
balancing risk and demand.
20. Happiest Minds
Suggestion:
Scale SaaS-style security platforms.
Overcoming: Happiest Minds grows
cloud-native security offerings,
turning ransomware fears into revenue with subscription-based contracts.
21. Newgen Software
Suggestion:
Integrate GenAI into workflow automation.
Overcoming: Newgen updates
platforms with AI-assisted workflows,
staying competitive against UiPath and other global players.
22. Sify Technologies
Suggestion:
Focus on green, energy-efficient data centers.
Overcoming: Sify invests in solar-powered and energy-optimized facilities,
tackling both cost and climate concerns.
23. Intellect Design Arena
Suggestion:
Rebrand as fintech integrator.
Overcoming: Intellect partners
with digital banks and CBDC pilots,
moving beyond legacy banking IT systems.
24. Quess Corp
Suggestion:
Shift from staffing to skill-based digital talent marketplace.
Overcoming: Quess experiments
with AI-enabled gig staffing platforms,
aligning with global flexible work trends.
25. SaaS Startups (Freshworks, Zoho,
BrowserStack)
Suggestion:
Build AI-native products and scale global marketing.
Overcoming: Freshworks
integrates GenAI support tools,
Zoho builds privacy-first SaaS,
and BrowserStack expands AI-based testing—competing
with global AI-native rivals.
Indian IT/tech brands are proving that while Trump-era reverse globalization forced structural shifts,
today’s AI and cyber threats demand
continuous reinvention. The key theme across all 25 firms is local presence, AI-first strategies, and
compliance-driven trust. Those who successfully blend low-cost delivery with high-value innovation
are the ones that will sustain growth into the late 2020s.
Table 7.3 – Suggestions & Recovery Paths of Indian IT/Tech Brands
(2025)
Brand |
Suggestion |
Overcoming
Strategy |
Infosys |
Accelerate GenAI-led services |
Partnered with NVIDIA/Microsoft, launched AI skilling hubs
in U.S. |
TCS |
Expand “friend-shoring” |
Built delivery centers in Canada/Mexico; automated
processes for retail/finance clients |
Wipro |
Strengthen cybersecurity |
Acquired U.S. security firms; AI-powered testing platforms |
HCLTech |
Compliance-first EU focus |
Built GDPR/AI Act teams; expanded AI labs in India |
Tech Mahindra |
Pivot to 5G + AI |
Partnered with Ericsson/Nokia; entered private 5G/digital
twin projects |
LTIMindtree |
Vertical-specific AI |
Launched airline/retail digital playbooks; reduced visa
reliance |
Cognizant India |
Move to IP-driven solutions |
Developed AI-enabled platforms; balanced local + offshore
workforce |
L&T Infotech |
Redesign contracts |
Added inflation clauses & currency hedging in client
deals |
Mphasis |
Diversify client base |
Expanded to fintech/insurance SaaS; reduced dependency on
U.S. banks |
Persistent Systems |
Build sovereign cloud-ready tools |
Developed local compliance cloud solutions for EU/APAC |
Hexaware |
Automation-first delivery |
Built AI-driven cost optimization to counter wage hikes |
NIIT Technologies |
Develop AI academies |
Launched in-house AI/cybersecurity skilling platforms |
Zensar Technologies |
Diversify sectors |
Expanded into healthcare & manufacturing analytics |
Birlasoft |
Cushion forex risks |
Entered auto/logistics IT; cautious Middle East expansion |
Sonata Software |
Resilience beyond tourism |
Grew ERP & AI-enabled commerce services |
Ramco Systems |
Aviation predictive analytics |
Introduced AI-driven ERP for aviation part tracking |
KPIT Technologies |
EV & chip collaboration |
Partnered with EV makers; invested in semiconductor
R&D |
Cyient |
Embed cyber-physical security |
Developed defense-grade cyber tools with aerospace
engineering |
Sasken Technologies |
Leverage chip wars |
Joined Indian chip initiatives; worked with U.S.
friend-shoring |
Happiest Minds |
SaaS-style cybersecurity |
Built subscription-based cloud-native security products |
Newgen Software |
GenAI workflow automation |
Integrated AI-assisted workflows into automation platforms |
Sify Technologies |
Green data centers |
Built solar-powered, energy-optimized IT facilities |
Intellect Design Arena |
Rebrand as fintech integrator |
Partnered with CBDC pilots & digital banks |
Quess Corp |
AI-driven staffing |
Created AI-based gig talent marketplace |
SaaS Startups (Freshworks, Zoho, BrowserStack) |
Build AI-native products |
Launched AI-based CRM, privacy-first SaaS, and AI-enabled
testing tools |
Closing Remarks
Chapter 7 reveals how reverse globalization and Trump-era visa restrictions
initially shook Indian IT and tech firms, but the post-2020 world accelerated even tougher challenges:
GenAI disruption, chip wars, rising cyberattacks, and compliance-heavy
regulations.
The 25
case-cum stories and recovery strategies show a pattern:
·
Localization:
Building delivery hubs closer to clients in North America and Europe.
·
AI-First
Playbooks: Making GenAI central to coding, testing, cybersecurity, and
automation.
·
Sectoral
Diversification: Reducing risk by expanding into fintech, healthcare,
EVs, and aviation.
·
Green and
Secure IT: Embracing sustainability (solar-powered data centers) and
cyber resilience.
·
Talent
Transformation: Investing in AI academies and in-house upskilling
rather than relying solely on visas.
The Indian IT sector’s journey proves that reverse globalization is not a wall but a filter
— firms that depended only on low-cost coding faced pressure, while those who blended innovation, compliance, and local
presence turned threats into global opportunities.
As the industry moves toward 2030, the ultimate survival test will
be:
“Can Indian
IT brands reinvent themselves as AI-powered,
compliance-trusted, globally local partners rather than just
offshore vendors?”
If the answer is yes, India’s tech giants will
continue to anchor global digital
transformation even in a protectionist world.
Comments
Post a Comment