Sunscreen Showdown: Ghazal Alagh
Accuses Lakmé of Product Imitation, Ignites Industry Debate
Mamaearth co-founder Ghazal Alagh recently stirred
up controversy by calling out Lakmé for allegedly copying
Mamaearth’s sunscreen stick product. This move has sparked debates across
the skincare and FMCG sectors. As competition intensifies in India’s booming
personal care market, this face-off is not just about two brands, but about ethics, innovation, and
consumer trust.
In a development that has stirred
the Indian skincare industry, Ghazal Alagh, co-founder of Honasa Consumer—the
parent company of Mamaearth—has publicly accused Hindustan Unilever's Lakmé
brand of imitating Mamaearth's sunscreen product. This allegation has sparked
widespread discussions about innovation, intellectual property, and ethical
practices within the beauty sector.
The Allegation
Alagh took to social media to
express her concerns, highlighting striking similarities between Mamaearth's
Aqua Glow Hydrating Sunscreen and Lakmé's newly launched sunscreen. She highlighted resemblances in product design, naming conventions, packaging aesthetics,
and key ingredients. Alagh emphasized the extensive research and development
that went into creating Mamaearth's product, suggesting that Lakmé's offering
was a direct imitation.
Industry Reactions
The accusation has elicited varied
responses from industry experts and consumers alike. Some have applauded Alagh
for standing up against what they perceive as unethical practices by larger
corporations. Others have called for a more nuanced understanding, noting that
similarities in product features are not uncommon in the highly competitive skincare
market.
Consumer Feedback
The controversy has also reignited
discussions about product efficacy and customer satisfaction. While some users
have voiced support for Mamaearth, citing positive experiences with its
products, others have shared criticisms. For instance, a user named Aditi
(@Sassy_Soul_) posted on social media, urging people to discard Mamaearth
products, claiming ineffectiveness. Alagh responded to such criticisms by
reaffirming her commitment to product quality and inviting direct feedback from
consumers.
Regulatory Scrutiny
This incident comes at a time when
Honasa Consumer is already under the scanner for advertising practices. The
Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) reported that Honasa had the
highest number of advertising violations in 2023, with 187 ads flagged for
issues ranging from misleading claims to non-compliance with guidelines.
Industry experts warn that repeated violations could erode consumer trust and
brand credibility.
Legal Challenges Abroad
Adding to Honasa's challenges, a UAE
court recently ordered the company to pay approximately Rs 57 crore in
compensation to its former distributor, RSM General Trading LLC. The court
found that Honasa had terminated the distributorship agreement without adhering
to contractual obligations. Honasa has announced plans to appeal the decision,
asserting that the court's order lacks merit.
Implications for the Industry
The public nature of Alagh's
accusation against Lakmé underscores the growing tensions between emerging
startups and established conglomerates in the beauty industry. It highlights
the challenges startups face in protecting their innovations and the need for
robust intellectual property safeguards. Moreover, the incident serves as a
reminder of the importance of ethical practices and transparency in maintaining
consumer trust.
Mamaearth
co-founder Ghazal Alagh
recently stirred up controversy by calling out Lakmé for allegedly copying
Mamaearth’s sunscreen stick product — a move that has sparked debates across
the skincare and FMCG sectors. As competition intensifies in India’s booming
personal care market, this face-off is not just about two brands, but about ethics, innovation, and
consumer trust.
🔥 Lakmé’s Threat
Landscape: What’s at Stake?
Threat |
Description |
1. Brand Image Risk |
Allegations may harm Lakmé’s reputation as an innovator. |
2. Loss of Consumer Trust |
Gen-Z and Millennials value originality and may boycott
perceived copycats. |
3. Legal Scrutiny |
IP infringement claims could escalate if Mamaearth
proceeds legally. |
4. Social Media Backlash |
Influencers and conscious buyers may side with Mamaearth. |
5. Comparison Reviews |
Online reviewers may now pit both products head-to-head,
affecting Lakmé’s product ratings. |
6. Innovation Reputation |
May be viewed as follower, not leader. |
7. Customer Migration |
Mamaearth’s loyal base could grow as a result of this
exposure. |
8. Product Cannibalization |
Similar products within Unilever’s portfolio (Lakmé
parent) may compete internally. |
9. Regulatory Audits |
If claims prove strong, regulatory scrutiny may increase. |
10. Influencer Detachment |
Influencers may pull back from promoting Lakmé amidst
controversy. |
11. Sustainability Criticism |
Mamaearth emphasizes natural, eco-friendly values, putting
pressure on Lakmé. |
12. Negative Press |
Media coverage framing Lakmé as a copier can have
long-term impact. |
13. Decline in Shelf Priority |
Retailers may prioritize Mamaearth for novelty appeal. |
14. Investor Concern |
Repeated accusations can concern institutional investors
in Unilever. |
15. Search Engine Decline |
SEO metrics might fall as Mamaearth sees a spike. |
16. Litigation Costs |
Potential legal defenses can divert resources. |
17. Consumer Lawsuits |
Class-action or customer-driven complaints are a remote
risk. |
18. Supply Chain Redesign |
If IP rules are tightened, Lakmé may need to rework
packaging or formula. |
19. Viral Content Impact |
Viral memes or reels could reinforce a negative
perception. |
20. Brand Loyalty Shifts |
Customers are increasingly switching to “conscious” brands
like Mamaearth. |
21. Retail Boycotts |
Natural-focused retailers might pause stocking copycat
products. |
22. Disruption in New Launches |
Launch plans for similar products may face delays or
redesigns. |
23. Global Scrutiny |
As a Unilever brand, Lakmé might attract criticism in
international markets. |
24. Ethical Investor Pushback |
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investors may
scrutinize such practices. |
25. Product Recall Risk |
In case of regulatory pressure or public pushback, a
recall might be demanded. |
📊 Data Snapshot: Online Trends
Metric |
Mamaearth
Sunscreen Stick |
Lakmé Sunscreen
Stick (New) |
Google Search Interest (March 2025) |
85/100 |
34/100 |
Instagram Hashtag Mentions (Past Week) |
#MamaearthSunscreen – 12k |
#LakmeStickSunscreen – 2.1k |
YouTube Reviews (Count) |
230+ |
47 |
Customer Ratings on Amazon (Avg) |
4.4 ⭐ |
3.8 ⭐ |
Price |
₹599 |
₹499 |
🧠 Suggestions for Lakmé (Post-Crisis Strategy)
- Acknowledge Feedback Publicly.
- Launch a "Lakmé Innovates" campaign
showing original R&D initiatives.
- Collaborate with Indian dermatologists for clinical
validation.
- Highlight unique ingredients or texture differences.
- Offer limited-edition variants
to stand out.
- Run a transparency report on
product development.
- Launch an interactive poll with
consumers on innovation ideas.
- Start a "Beauty Backed by Science"
series on social media.
- Sponsor sustainability influencers
to bridge the ethical image gap.
- Run a “Build Your Product” contest
inviting Gen-Z inputs.
- Collaborate with AYUSH or local labs to
promote local sourcing.
- Create a video showcasing Lakmé’s heritage
and originality.
- Invite Ghazal Alagh for a public dialogue or
roundtable.
- Introduce a QR code on products
linking to full formulation story.
- Partner with tech startups for
innovation acceleration.
- Use AR filters showing
sunscreen stick effects for awareness.
- Launch a skin consultation app to
differentiate digitally.
- Increase customer education about SPF and sun
protection.
- Offer sunscreen combo packs with
unique value add-ons.
- Work with colleges to encourage product
design challenges.
- Share behind-the-scenes R&D labs via
Insta reels.
- Create a Sunscreen Lab Pop-up Booth
in malls.
- Emphasize cruelty-free, dermat-tested certifications.
- Launch a Lakmé Originality Pledge
on World Creativity Day.
- Host a "What Makes Us Original" panel
with experts and consumers.
Conclusion
The public nature of Alagh's accusation against Lakmé underscores the growing tensions between emerging startups and established conglomerates in the beauty industry. It highlights the challenges startups face in protecting their innovations and the need for robust intellectual property safeguards. Moreover, the incident serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical practices and transparency in maintaining consumer trust. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how Lakmé will respond to the allegations and whether this incident will prompt broader discussions about innovation and ethics in the skincare industry. For consumers, the controversy offers an opportunity to reflect on the values they prioritize when choosing products
References
- Ghazal Alagh’s statement
on Instagram (March 2025) – original video & caption [@ghazalalagh]
- Google Trends Data – March–April 2025
- Amazon India – Customer Ratings (Sunscreen
Stick Category)
- Instagram Hashtags – via Meta Tools for
Business
- Mint, Business Standard & YourStory
articles (March–April 2025)
- Mamaearth Official Website – https://mamaearth.in
- Lakmé Product Listings – https://lakmeindia.com
No comments:
Post a Comment